2
Aug/10
0

Mortgage firm to pay £500,000 compensation for unfair fees

A sub-prime mortgage company has been hit with a whopping £630,000 fine by the City watchdog for treating customers in arrears unfairly.

Redstone Mortgages Limited overcharged customers a combined £500,000 in arrears fees between January 2007 and August 2009 and must pay that sum in addition to the fine. The Financial Services Authority (FSA), which issued the punishment, says borrowers hit with excessive arrears charges will be contacted by the firm to offer compensation. Redstone also demanded cash to cut customers’ arrears without considering their financial state and wrote “repetitive, excessive and confusing” letters.

Redstone, which is not a lender, bought large swathes of mortgages from specialist lenders that mainly sold loans to those with poor credit histories or homeowners who could not prove their income. Those whose loans were bought, now owe Redstone the money, not their original lender.

Redstone compensation

The regulator has identified four types of excessive charges. Redstone is currently sifting through customer records to determine who has been overcharged. When that process is complete, it will write to customers offering redress, though the FSA warns that could take months.

The unfair fees were:

  • Charging for failed direct debits each time it attempted to take payment, even when this happened multiple times within a short time.
  • Including arrears charges in the balance on which an early repayment charge (ERC, which is a percentage of the outstanding balance) was calculated.
  • Charging for debt counsellor visits when the customer was not given an appointment time or was not told of their right to cancel.
  • A solicitor’s fee, applied when Redstone unnecessarily instructed lawyers.

The FSA, which does not have a breakdown of the average amount charged to individual borrowers, says homeowners will know if they’re a Redstone customer if the name appears on their mortgage statement.

General mortgage arrears fee reclaiming

The FSA launched a crackdown on high mortgage arrears fees in January and is encouraging anyone who feels badly treated to complain. It says poor lender practices centre on the size of fees and how they’re charged:

  • Excessive fees. One of the clearest examples, the FSA says, is where the charge is higher than the administrative cost to the lender. If it costs £10 to send a letter but the charge is £35, that’s £25 too much. Lenders often charge around £35 per missed payment, £100 for a debt collector visit and thousands in legal and estate agent fees if your property is repossessed.
  • Unfair charging. The FSA has found numerous examples of firms sneakily finding ways to incorporate charges when they shouldn’t. For example, when struggling borrowers are already on a repayment plan, though this is now banned. Also, lenders charging non-direct debit payment fees (to pay for payment processing) when no payment was made, or including arrears charges in the total mortgage balance when calculating an ERC.

How do you reclaim?

If you believe you’ve been mis sold a mortgage by Redstone or any other lender, you can start your claim now with Mis Sold Mortgages.

Are you owed compensation?

Related posts:

  1. Mortgage lender fined over reposession policy
  2. FSA to ban fast-track and self-certified mortgages
  3. Watchdog acts on mortgage mis-selling
  4. Mortgage mis-selling claims set to rise, says new firm
  5. Mortgage mis-selling case could impact on repossession

Comments (0) Trackbacks (0)

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

No trackbacks yet.

WP-Cumulus by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.

Consumer Help is a division of Gravitas Law who are regulated by the Ministry of Justice in respect of claims management activities.
Our registration is recorded on this website: www.claimsregulation.gov.uk Our Authorisation no. is CRM15800.
Our Data Protection registration number (ICO) is Z1888535

Whilst the partners of Keith Park Solicitors have an interest in Gravitas Law the services that we provide are not regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority
and no protection is afforded to you through the Solicitors Regulation Authority, rather your protection and our conduct is governed by the Ministry of Justice.

Complaints Procedure